Sex chat rooms male ai
In this game both the man and the woman aim to convince the guests that they are the other.
(Huma Shah argues that this two-human version of the game was presented by Turing only to introduce the reader to the machine-human question-answer test.
For we can easily understand a machine's being constituted so that it can utter words, and even emit some responses to action on it of a corporeal kind, which brings about a change in its organs; for instance, if touched in a particular part it may ask what we wish to say to it; if in another part it may exclaim that it is being hurt, and so on.
But it never happens that it arranges its speech in various ways, in order to reply appropriately to everything that may be said in its presence, as even the lowest type of man can do.
In this version, which Turing discussed in a BBC radio broadcast, a jury asks questions of a computer and the role of the computer is to make a significant proportion of the jury believe that it is really a man.
Turing's paper considered nine putative objections, which include all the major arguments against artificial intelligence that have been raised in the years since the paper was published (see "Computing Machinery and Intelligence").
Descartes fails to consider the possibility that future automata might be able to overcome such insufficiency, and so does not propose the Turing test as such, even if he prefigures its conceptual framework and criterion.
Denis Diderot formulates in his Pensées philosophiques a Turing-test criterion: "If they find a parrot who could answer to everything, I would claim it to be an intelligent being without hesitation." This does not mean he agrees with this, but that it was already a common argument of materialists at that time.
According to materialism, the mind can be explained physically, which leaves open the possibility of minds that are produced artificially.If a keyword is found, a rule that transforms the user's comments is applied, and the resulting sentence is returned.If a keyword is not found, ELIZA responds either with a generic riposte or by repeating one of the earlier comments.If the evaluator cannot reliably tell the machine from the human, the machine is said to have passed the test.The test results do not depend on the machine's ability to give correct answers to questions, only how closely its answers resemble those a human would give.